Oh my.  That whole Sheep discussion has sort of gone off and taken on a life of its own!  But the main issues are the same: Christian Husband, asserting Romans 13:


13:1 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God’s wrath but also for the sake of conscience. For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.


Which, if you are a Catholic and a Republican, you should be pretty happy about this scripture.  Much discussion has ensued between XH and Therese about the idea of the authority of the pope and apostolic succession in light of the above.  But perhaps we should look at some smaller examples in order to get more guidance on this.  The main one being Paul, himself.


Paul was not among the original 12 disciples.  In fact, his first encounter was him being (known as Saul) a Pharisee and witnessing and approving the stoning of Stephen in Acts 7 and his persecution in acts 8.  It wasn’t until he had a personal revelation in Acts 9 that he became a disciple.  Up until that time, he was under the authority of the high priest.  But what about after his revelation?  He was no longer under that authority but under the authority of God.  Therefore, despite what Paul says in Romans, he himself is an example of one whose authority and mandate changed based on the working of the Holy Spirit.  God is well able to trump whatever authority He establishes in earth.  For if Paul was still living his own assertion, he would have submitted himself to the high priest in order to be tried and executed right there in Damascus.  But he didn’t.  He escaped. 


According to Romans 13, the governing authorities govern at God’s pleasure.  In this way, I get XH’s assertion about God setting up and removing earthly authorities as He sees fit.  Much of the Old Testament consists of God using various kingdoms and rulers in order to discipline and test His people.  However, the revelation of the Holy spirit seems to grant some sort of exclusion to earthly authorities and this is how new movements, reformations and revivals get started.  No earthly authority trumps God’s authority.  God sets up leaders according to His purposes, but brings them down according to those same purposes.  Leaders and people alike are like grass who grow, whither, die and get blown away.  But God’s Spirit remains.


In Romans 13, Paul is clearly talking about the relationship believers should have to the civilian authorities.  In Romans 14, he is more focused on how we are to deal with each other, with love being the over riding factor.  If someone’s authority becomes a stumbling block to someone else, is it truly established by God?


I believe the Holy Spirit is on the move in His church, and not just churches as you all understand them.  We have the luxury of wealth and security in order to afford the big, opulent buildings and a well-paid professional clergy who have very good standards of living.   We can afford to go to large gatherings and play loud music without fear of someone coming to arrest us and kill us.


But this is not true in many other places in the world.  China, Sudan, Indonesia, India and Pakistan are just a few places where the church is being persecuted.  And yet more and more people are being taught, equipped and baptized each and everyday without all of the things so many of you see as an essential part of your regular church experience, including large buildings and crowds.  I would argue that these church families are healthier and more productive because of their hardships.  They are functioning well without ordination, seminaries, apostolic succession, large ornate cathedrals, big organs or big praise bands, lots of parking, pledge cards or stewardship drives. 


And they are, by meeting and becoming Christians and encouraging others to do so, breaking the laws of the places in which they live.  They are often imprisoned just like Paul was.  Are these people sinning?  If the Bible enjoins them to preach the word and the law of their country says it is unlawful, how then could they then NOT sin under Romans 13?  Would you be willing to smuggle a Bible into one of these countries?  Would doing so be a sin?  When Brother Andrew was smuggling Bibles across the iron curtain, was he engaged in sin?  How and why did God bless his work, then?  Does God bless sin?  Did God establish the godless Soviet empire? 


There is no end to this. 


There are clearly those who occupy positions of authority who do NOT have God’s stamp of approval.  Those people occupy positional authority by virtue of having a bigger army, police force or whatever.  But that is not true and authentic authority.  And truly, only the Holy Spirit can help us divine the truth of it.  When Ehud killed Eglon (Judges 3) instead of just paying tribute, he had a revelation from God that it was time to put an end to Moabite rule.  Eglon served his purpose and God put an end to his life.  This sounds pretty cruel, but it is true of us all.  We can be swept away as easily as dried grass.  Again there is this bind with Ehud: he obeys God and kills this earthly ruler (thus sinning) or he disobeys God and still sins. 


So in this way, we do have a paradox that we need to figure out how to reconcile.  Jesus was pretty explicit that in His kingdom the greatest would be the least and the servant would be the master.  Our concept of authority is not the same as God’s, and in every case, God’s will is clearly sovereign.  God can make a silk’s purse out of the sow’s ear every time.  Is that the way He wants it?  I think God would like it if we would simply do what He tells us, but He recognizes that  we are going to do certain things based on our own free will and sets things up accordingly.


We only know in part right now and one day we will know the fullness of the plan, whatever it is.  That’s sort of what faith is all about.




4 Responses to Authority

  1. FTN says:

    Excellently said. I don’t have much to add. I always loved the story of Ehud, but perhaps that’s because, when I first heard it as a teenager, I couldn’t get enough of stories like this:

    As the king rose from his seat, Ehud reached with his left hand, drew the sword from his right thigh and plunged it into the king’s belly. Even the handle sank in after the blade, which came out his back. Ehud did not pull the sword out, and the fat closed in over it.

    How can you not love a story like that?

    It’s important that we don’t make the Bible into an idol. It is God’s word, but we also need to take specific verses in the context of the entirety of God’s plan through Jesus. We are living in the year of the Lord’s favor. That’s not to say there are no absolutes, that’s only to say that sometimes we can be short-sighted in our thinking when we study a couple of verses by themselves. I know I have been guilty of this myself.

  2. Square1 says:

    I have always thought it odd that people gloss over the fact that Paul was not among the original 12 disciples, but instead treat his writings as if he was there and walked with Jesus himself.

    Too many people blindly take the book and misintrepret it’s context because they lack the knowledge of the history behind it, and the significance each person has… or they place a significance on something that was not meant to be significant at all.

    Even as a Christian I had a problem with this.

  3. diggerjones says:

    FTN, you left out the funnest part!

    “…for he did not pull the sword out of his belly; and the dung came out.”

    Can you imagine those poor servants? “Whew! Whose idea was it to feed the King all those beans? *I’M* not going in there! YOU go! It’s almost like somebody DIED in there!”

    Square, Paul’s testimony is valid because he did have a personal revelation and God’s Spirit clearly rested upon him…just like it is supposed to rest on all believers. Paul’s mission was important, but what is debatable is whether Paul (or Jesus) came to start a new religion. Religion is not the path to God. I think you had a grasp of this at one time, but you were left out there dangling for too long.

    Now I’m feeling bad about this. I knew you were in the wilderness and did nothing.

    God have mercy on me.

  4. Square1 says:

    God has his reasons for putting each of through our own wilderness, Digger. And where I appreciate your apology… My spiritual walk is my own responsibility, and always has been. We are our brother’s keeper, yes. but ultimately we are each responsible for ourselves.

    By the way I have never heard a fellow Muslim sister or brother refer to Christians or Jews as infidels. Rather both are considered children of the book, since we all worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. There is simply disagrement between the three on the route to the same destination we would all like to achieve, and Jesus’ role in the grand scheme of things. Regardless we are not to judge… because only God knows our hearts and intentions.

    When my husband first reverted I began reading my Bible constantly in a knee jerk reaction to fortify my own faith. I kept being led to verses written by Paul that were in direct conflict with things that Jesus himself spoke. I came to passages like one in Micah that say, (not verbatim) “What does God expect of you but to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God?”

    These are three things that are very valued in Islam as it is supposed to be practiced… Anyway… I did not mean to write a diatribe here. I’ll save the rest for my own blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: