<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fucking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/</link>
	<description>A struggle for freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C-Marie</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11850</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11850</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s just something about that word...  it&#039;s aggressive, it&#039;s bold, it&#039;s primal,
hot
direct
forceful
expressive
taboo
commanding
passionate
animal...

Yeah, It fuckin&#039; rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s just something about that word&#8230;  it&#8217;s aggressive, it&#8217;s bold, it&#8217;s primal,<br />
hot<br />
direct<br />
forceful<br />
expressive<br />
taboo<br />
commanding<br />
passionate<br />
animal&#8230;</p>
<p>Yeah, It fuckin&#8217; rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trueself</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11809</link>
		<dc:creator>Trueself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11809</guid>
		<description>Doing and being done at the same time.  That&#039;s what BJ and I have together when we are together.  I have never had that with anyone else ever, particularly W.  W was (when he cared for sex at all) much more interested in getting me to the big O so he could have his and get over with.  That, in my book, has nothing to do with fucking or lovemaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doing and being done at the same time.  That&#8217;s what BJ and I have together when we are together.  I have never had that with anyone else ever, particularly W.  W was (when he cared for sex at all) much more interested in getting me to the big O so he could have his and get over with.  That, in my book, has nothing to do with fucking or lovemaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diggerjones</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11807</link>
		<dc:creator>diggerjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11807</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just a word, Square.  But it is a powerful enough one and useful enough one that can easily become diluted with overuse, like in the military.  That&#039;s why people use it overly much.  I thought of you while writing this because you do recognize the power of words in your own writing and had asked something about it one of your earlier posts.

Glad you didn&#039;t get too bent about being made an example of Taja!  I was hoping that I didn&#039;t go too far astray.

Yeah, Dave, you are *highly* fortunate!  Too fortunate, in fact.  Maybe we can get you more conflicted in the next installment!

I know that it seems like these women who like sex are like aliens to you (and me) FTN, and seem to be in the minority.  But I&#039;m not totally buying it.  I think women have a keener sense of penetration than me.  I also think that women like our wives are hiding more than we think.  As far as what we did earlier, I might sometimes think of that as fucking, but it wasn&#039;t really.  It was her dealing with her anxiety about our relationship and me being Lizard Man and enjoying the sensations.  We were not *doing* each other, tho, really.  We were doing *something* for sure and at the time it was enough.  See my post about XH on Unsolicited Advice.  Reading his post, you can see that while they are doing more activities than either you or I, he still suffers from the same basic lack of intimacy.  

Katie, what shall I do with you?!?  You really could be a good sex blogger.

Yeah, I do get the mutual masturbation thing, Desmond, and Schnarch refers to that as sort of using your reptilian brain, or the nonthinking part instead of the neocortex. It&#039;s easy because it allows us to avoid all the stuff that can shut us down, threaten us and cause anxiety. As far as John Eldridge, I&#039;ve read parts of it, visited the website and linked to an interview of his where I get the gist of his message.  He&#039;s got a lot of good points.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a word, Square.  But it is a powerful enough one and useful enough one that can easily become diluted with overuse, like in the military.  That&#8217;s why people use it overly much.  I thought of you while writing this because you do recognize the power of words in your own writing and had asked something about it one of your earlier posts.</p>
<p>Glad you didn&#8217;t get too bent about being made an example of Taja!  I was hoping that I didn&#8217;t go too far astray.</p>
<p>Yeah, Dave, you are *highly* fortunate!  Too fortunate, in fact.  Maybe we can get you more conflicted in the next installment!</p>
<p>I know that it seems like these women who like sex are like aliens to you (and me) FTN, and seem to be in the minority.  But I&#8217;m not totally buying it.  I think women have a keener sense of penetration than me.  I also think that women like our wives are hiding more than we think.  As far as what we did earlier, I might sometimes think of that as fucking, but it wasn&#8217;t really.  It was her dealing with her anxiety about our relationship and me being Lizard Man and enjoying the sensations.  We were not *doing* each other, tho, really.  We were doing *something* for sure and at the time it was enough.  See my post about XH on Unsolicited Advice.  Reading his post, you can see that while they are doing more activities than either you or I, he still suffers from the same basic lack of intimacy.  </p>
<p>Katie, what shall I do with you?!?  You really could be a good sex blogger.</p>
<p>Yeah, I do get the mutual masturbation thing, Desmond, and Schnarch refers to that as sort of using your reptilian brain, or the nonthinking part instead of the neocortex. It&#8217;s easy because it allows us to avoid all the stuff that can shut us down, threaten us and cause anxiety. As far as John Eldridge, I&#8217;ve read parts of it, visited the website and linked to an interview of his where I get the gist of his message.  He&#8217;s got a lot of good points.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desmond Jones</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11799</link>
		<dc:creator>Desmond Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11799</guid>
		<description>Well, I think great sex, in whatever form, involves a high degree of mutuality, whether it be agressive and passionate &#039;fucking&#039;, or relaxed and sensual &#039;lovemaking&#039;, or what-have-you.  And that&#039;s the thing that can be hard to get to.  It&#039;s easy, from my own experience, for the two of us to sort of be taking care of ourselves on each other&#039;s bodies, if you know what I mean.  It&#039;s a deeper level to look after each other - &#039;do&#039; each other, if you wanna say it that way - and do it &lt;i&gt;together&lt;/i&gt;.

And, I do resonate with the notion that men get their aggression &#039;socialized and censored right out of us&#039;.  I just finished &lt;i&gt;&#039;Wild at Heart&#039;&lt;/i&gt;, and that was the thing that just burrowed into my soul and wouldn&#039;t let go. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think great sex, in whatever form, involves a high degree of mutuality, whether it be agressive and passionate &#8216;fucking&#8217;, or relaxed and sensual &#8216;lovemaking&#8217;, or what-have-you.  And that&#8217;s the thing that can be hard to get to.  It&#8217;s easy, from my own experience, for the two of us to sort of be taking care of ourselves on each other&#8217;s bodies, if you know what I mean.  It&#8217;s a deeper level to look after each other &#8211; &#8216;do&#8217; each other, if you wanna say it that way &#8211; and do it <i>together</i>.</p>
<p>And, I do resonate with the notion that men get their aggression &#8217;socialized and censored right out of us&#8217;.  I just finished <i>&#8216;Wild at Heart&#8217;</i>, and that was the thing that just burrowed into my soul and wouldn&#8217;t let go. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11798</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11798</guid>
		<description>&quot;The fantasy of fucking involves being ridden hard and put up wet.&quot;

Towel, please.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The fantasy of fucking involves being ridden hard and put up wet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Towel, please.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTN</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11796</link>
		<dc:creator>FTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11796</guid>
		<description>Hmm... Two things:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I think us men sometimes have our aggression socialized and censored right out of us.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That part is so true, and it&#039;s often never more evident than in the church itself. We&#039;re socialized to be nice guys! Testosterone and aggression are bad! Sex isn&#039;t talked about, because as long as you wait for marriage, it&#039;ll be great, right?!

Also, I&#039;m not sure I could totally agree with the idea that women have that much more of a comfort level with everything sexual. If Schnarch is seeing that at his lectures, &lt;i&gt;that&#039;s because he&#039;s only seeing the type of people that go to sex lectures or sex counseling!&lt;/i&gt; I have no doubt that there are groups of women that are &quot;comfortable with being sexual,&quot; but to be honest, I don&#039;t know if I know any of them. And I *know* my wife doesn&#039;t know anyone like that, because she sticks to the motif that the only women that ARE like that are the tiny group that are around on these blogs!

Digger, would you consider some of the sexual things that were happening much earlier in you and Arwyn&#039;s relationship to be &quot;doing&quot; (or fucking, which is hard for me to even type)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; Two things:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I think us men sometimes have our aggression socialized and censored right out of us.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That part is so true, and it&#8217;s often never more evident than in the church itself. We&#8217;re socialized to be nice guys! Testosterone and aggression are bad! Sex isn&#8217;t talked about, because as long as you wait for marriage, it&#8217;ll be great, right?!</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not sure I could totally agree with the idea that women have that much more of a comfort level with everything sexual. If Schnarch is seeing that at his lectures, <i>that&#8217;s because he&#8217;s only seeing the type of people that go to sex lectures or sex counseling!</i> I have no doubt that there are groups of women that are &#8220;comfortable with being sexual,&#8221; but to be honest, I don&#8217;t know if I know any of them. And I *know* my wife doesn&#8217;t know anyone like that, because she sticks to the motif that the only women that ARE like that are the tiny group that are around on these blogs!</p>
<p>Digger, would you consider some of the sexual things that were happening much earlier in you and Arwyn&#8217;s relationship to be &#8220;doing&#8221; (or fucking, which is hard for me to even type)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11791</guid>
		<description>Interesting, and some of this is exactly right- when Lynn and I fuck, and it&#039;s what it should be, there&#039;s the whole carnal let it go do each other thing going, and it&#039;s wonderful.

I&#039;m pretty lucky in that respect though, we&#039;re pretty suited for each other, in her own understanding of what she wants and needs, and my willingness to try to give that- and the reverse, I am able to tell her what would be good, and she&#039;s open to trying that too. 

Maybe more than just &quot;pretty&quot; lucky, huh? Very much so indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, and some of this is exactly right- when Lynn and I fuck, and it&#8217;s what it should be, there&#8217;s the whole carnal let it go do each other thing going, and it&#8217;s wonderful.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty lucky in that respect though, we&#8217;re pretty suited for each other, in her own understanding of what she wants and needs, and my willingness to try to give that- and the reverse, I am able to tell her what would be good, and she&#8217;s open to trying that too. </p>
<p>Maybe more than just &#8220;pretty&#8221; lucky, huh? Very much so indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tajalude</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11789</link>
		<dc:creator>tajalude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11789</guid>
		<description>Fuckin&#039; a.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuckin&#8217; a.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So You Want to Be a DRR King&#8230; &#171; Unsolicited Advice: Wordpress Version</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11787</link>
		<dc:creator>So You Want to Be a DRR King&#8230; &#171; Unsolicited Advice: Wordpress Version</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11787</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m just staying with the theme, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m just staying with the theme, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Square1</title>
		<link>http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11786</link>
		<dc:creator>Square1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diggerjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/fucking/#comment-11786</guid>
		<description>I have to say I agree with almost everything in here. I wish a different term could be applied, but I understand the necessity of something that captures the gravity of the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I agree with almost everything in here. I wish a different term could be applied, but I understand the necessity of something that captures the gravity of the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
